docs: restore presentation route manifest coverage

This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-07-13 14:17:45 +07:00 Verified
parent 4480fafc1f
commit 05c7d7ceb8
3 changed files with 59 additions and 31 deletions
@@ -31,14 +31,11 @@ can be shown after selecting replay with the runbook's session-storage switch.
| `architecture/client` | Human and agent clients use the same public lifecycle operations. | Architecture client node | System architecture figure | hidden | replay-only; Thesis System Architecture; `docs/project_map.md`; `docs/source_architecture.md` | `architecture/client` |
| `architecture/api` | JSON-RPC handles transport concerns and delegates to WorkflowApi rather than owning domain behavior. | Architecture API node | Client operations | hidden | replay-only; Thesis System Architecture; `docs/project_map.md`; `docs/source_architecture.md` | `architecture/api` |
| `architecture/runtime` | Server composition supplies stores, provider projections, and the runtime while the core remains independent of MCP and Python behavior. | Runtime/providers focus | Architecture overview | hidden | replay-only; Thesis System Architecture; `docs/project_map.md`; `docs/source_architecture.md` | `architecture/runtime` |
| `authoring/discover` | Before authoring, a client can discover sources, capabilities, and schemas instead of guessing at hidden interfaces. | Authoring discovery surface | Capability/schema list | hidden | replay-only; CLI documentation; draft authoring API; challenge UX findings | `authoring/discover` |
| `authoring/author` | Focused operations let an external agent change a mutable Draft while preserving a clear lifecycle boundary. | Draft authoring surface | Workflow structure | hidden | replay-only; CLI documentation; draft authoring API; challenge UX findings | `authoring/author` |
| `authoring/diagnose` | Validation returns structured diagnostics, affected paths, repair hints, and suggested next actions. | Diagnostic receipt | Draft authoring surface | hidden | replay-only; CLI documentation; draft authoring API; challenge UX findings | `authoring/diagnose` |
| `authoring/repair` | These surfaces make invalid intermediate drafts repairable; they support a loop, but no hint guarantees success. | Repair guidance | Diagnostic receipt | hidden | replay-only; CLI documentation; draft authoring API; challenge UX findings | `authoring/repair` |
| `agent-handoff/request` | I will now show a prepared demonstration built on this platform. The chat is a presentation interface, not the autonomous planner evaluated by the thesis. The chat translates a report request into the same public lifecycle operations an external agent could call. This prepared path demonstrates product behavior and recorded evidence, not a fresh model-performance result. | Agent request surface | Workflow substrate framing | hidden | replay-only; Constrained demo agent and prepared replay recipe | `agent-handoff/request` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/discover` | The later issue-review example first inspects configured local.lda_docs, report, and issue-board capabilities. | Prepared lifecycle: discovery | Capability/schema evidence | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/discover` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/draft` | It creates and edits a Draft for report generation, making the proposal visible before execution. | Prepared lifecycle: draft | Workflow definition | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/draft` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/validate` | It validates incomplete state, exposes a missing output binding, and applies a targeted repair. | Prepared lifecycle: validation | Diagnostic evidence | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/validate` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/diagnose` | Validation returns structured diagnostics, affected paths, repair hints, and suggested next actions. | Diagnostic receipt | Draft authoring surface | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/diagnose` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/repair` | These surfaces make invalid intermediate drafts repairable; they support a loop, but no hint guarantees success. | Repair guidance | Diagnostic receipt | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/repair` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/artifact` | It saves the validated plan as immutable artifact lda_report_case_study version 1. | Prepared lifecycle: artifact | Lifecycle state | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/artifact` |
| `prepared-lifecycle/deployment` | This later issue-review example is richer than the thesis three-node deterministic report case study: it is an implementation extension built on the same platform. Deployment binds and validates a ready configuration but does not run the workflow. | Prepared lifecycle: deployment | Binding/readiness evidence | hidden | replay-only; `examples/lda_report_workflow`; deployment inspect replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/deployment` |
| `run-from-deployment/input` | The deployment receives selected local documents and an issue-board path. | Workflow input panel | Prepared deployment | hidden | live-capable; `workflow.runs.start` replay evidence | `prepared-lifecycle/deployment` |