chore: tighten scheduling review coverage

This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-09-09 21:50:24 +07:00 Verified
parent afb291d55c
commit 2ecdbdaa7f
17 changed files with 358 additions and 366 deletions
+8 -6
View File
@@ -1433,7 +1433,9 @@ would still need to preserve the lifecycle's transaction and ownership
contracts; changing the storage engine alone would not prove those
properties.
Scheduled deployment execution is not implemented. Nor does exposing a
Scheduled deployment execution is implemented within the documented first
slice. It remains bounded by the filesystem-backed, single-process store and
the explicitly enabled local/static server composition. Nor does exposing a
provider's callable operations imply that its interactive widgets or entire
user experience are reproduced through the workflow API.
@@ -1501,11 +1503,11 @@ and data-binding model are understandable without implementation knowledge.
## Scheduling and the Surrounding Application
Scheduled deployment execution is a required product direction, not an
implemented capability. It introduces trigger identity, overlap policy,
and recovery decisions in addition to time-expression parsing. It should
build on the same run lifecycle rather than create a separate execution
model. Suspending an already-running workflow until a time or event is a
Scheduled deployment execution is implemented for the current slice. It
introduces trigger identity, overlap policy, and recovery decisions in
addition to time-expression parsing, and builds on the same run lifecycle
rather than creating a separate execution model. Extending it to distributed
workers or suspending an already-running workflow until a time or event is a
related but distinct design question; a wait node is not specified here.
The surrounding application is intended to combine assistant-backed chat