lda.chat/lda-wf
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: plan defense rehearsal gate

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-07-13 00:04:58 +07:00 Verified
parent 1602f6946f
commit 527ec3de29
2 changed files with 335 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/current_roadmap.md
+2 -1
View File
@@ -312,7 +312,8 @@ separate activity after these surfaces are stable.
[`presentation visual scale and color pass plan`](historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-12-presentation-visual-scale-color-pass.md). [`presentation visual scale and color pass plan`](historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-12-presentation-visual-scale-color-pass.md).
8. **Rehearsal gate:** run all 14 scenes at 16:9 and 4:3, verify the Scene 8 → 8. **Rehearsal gate:** run all 14 scenes at 16:9 and 4:3, verify the Scene 8 →
Scene 11 → Scene 12 path in live and replay modes, then review the story Scene 11 → Scene 12 path in live and replay modes, then review the story
flow, coverage, and ordering separately. flow, coverage, and ordering separately. Implementation plan:
[`defense rehearsal gate`](superpowers/plans/2026-07-13-defense-rehearsal-gate.md).
9. **Deferred: factual input file browser:** replace the Scene 10 input 9. **Deferred: factual input file browser:** replace the Scene 10 input
manifest-only view with a read-only browser backed by canonical prepared or manifest-only view with a read-only browser backed by canonical prepared or
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-13-defense-rehearsal-gate.md
+333
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
# Defense Rehearsal Gate Implementation Plan
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** Turn the current 14-scene presentation into a repeatable rehearsal artifact by checking every scene at 16:9 and 4:3, validating the live/replay demo path, and recording story-flow findings without mixing in new product features.
**Architecture:** Keep `/present` as the source of truth for scene and beat definitions. Add a small route matrix and screenshot runner that derive their coverage from the storyboard rather than maintaining a second presentation model. Use browser smoke checks for geometry and interaction, then write a human-readable story audit that separates visual defects, factual gaps, and product holes.
**Tech Stack:** React 19, TypeScript, Vitest, existing `pnpx playwright screenshot` tooling, PowerShell, Markdown runbooks, and the existing `mainScenes`/`hashForLocation` presentation contracts.
## Global Constraints
- Do not add new product functionality during rehearsal; log product holes as follow-up work.
- Do not alter thesis claims, workflow facts, run records, trace records, or live/replay semantics.
- Preserve the user’s current uncommitted Scene 9 bottom-alignment fix and `26rem` Scene 2 height unless a screenshot proves either causes a concrete regression.
- Test both `1280x720` and `1024x768` at browser zoom 100%.
- Treat screenshots as human-reviewed evidence; do not use pixel snapshots as the correctness oracle.
- Keep the existing runbook fallback: the defense must remain explainable when the RPC server or live target is unavailable.
- Do not mark a route healthy merely because it returns HTTP 200; verify visible scene content, controls, and layout metrics.
---
### Task 1: Define The Rehearsal Route Matrix
**Files:**
- Create: `docs/runbooks/presentation-rehearsal-matrix.md`
- Modify: `docs/runbooks/defense-presentation.md`
- Test: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/storyboard-navigation.test.ts`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: `mainScenes` and `hashForLocation` from `web/apps/console/src/presentation/storyboard-navigation.ts`.
- Produces: one documented matrix covering all 14 scenes, every beat, the canonical hash, visual primary, expected chat mode, and the evidence/fallback note.
- [ ] **Step 1: Enumerate the canonical route matrix from the storyboard.**
Use the current scene definitions, not stale historical names. The matrix must include these scene IDs and their current beat IDs:
```text
thesis: title, substrate
problem: direct-actions, missing-contracts
positioning: landscape, lda-position
planner-runtime: planner, runtime, boundary
lifecycle: draft, artifact, deployment, run
architecture: client, api, runtime, node-use
authoring: discover, author, diagnose, repair
agent-handoff: request
prepared-lifecycle: discover, draft, validate, artifact, deployment
run-from-deployment: input, operation, graph
typed-human-boundary: interrupt, approval
resume-output-evidence: resume, output, trace
evaluation: cohort, validity, findings
conclusion: limits, future, conclusion, questions
```
- [ ] **Step 2: Add a route coverage assertion.**
In `storyboard-navigation.test.ts`, assert that every `mainScenes` scene has at least one canonical hash and that the expected scene/beat pairs above round-trip through `hashForLocation` and `locationFromHash`. Keep the assertions field-level and make a missing beat fail with its scene ID.
- [ ] **Step 3: Write the rehearsal matrix.**
For every route, record:
- what the presenter should say in one sentence;
- the dominant visual and the supporting visual;
- whether chat is hidden, full, rail, or dock;
- whether the beat is replay-only, live-capable, or requires an explicit run;
- the exact fallback route if live evidence is unavailable.
Do not invent expected output. Point to the existing evidence pointer or runbook section.
- [ ] **Step 4: Link the matrix from the defense runbook.**
Add the matrix beside `Useful Deep Links`, and explicitly state that it is the route checklist for rehearsal, not a new story or product contract.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run the focused navigation tests and commit.**
```powershell
pnpm --dir web/apps/console test -- src/presentation/storyboard-navigation.test.ts
git add docs/runbooks/presentation-rehearsal-matrix.md docs/runbooks/defense-presentation.md web/apps/console/src/presentation/storyboard-navigation.test.ts
git commit -m "docs: define presentation rehearsal route matrix"
```
---
### Task 2: Add A Repeatable Screenshot Runner
**Files:**
- Create: `scripts/presentation-rehearsal.ps1`
- Modify: `.gitignore`
- Modify: `docs/runbooks/presentation-visual-review.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: a running `pnpm --dir web dev` server at `http://127.0.0.1:5173` and the route matrix from Task 1.
- Produces: ignored screenshots under `web/apps/console/.visual-smoke/rehearsal/<viewport>/` with stable route-based names.
- [ ] **Step 1: Define the capture inputs.**
The script must accept an optional base URL and output root, defaulting to:
```powershell
$BaseUrl = "http://127.0.0.1:5173"
$OutputRoot = "web/apps/console/.visual-smoke/rehearsal"
$Viewports = @("1280,720", "1024,768")
```
Use the complete matrix from Task 1. Do not hand-maintain a partial “interesting routes” list.
- [ ] **Step 2: Capture each route at both viewports.**
Each capture must use the settled route and wait at least 800 ms before capture:
```powershell
pnpx --yes playwright screenshot `
--viewport-size $Viewport `
--wait-for-timeout 800 `
"$BaseUrl/present#scene/$Route" `
"$OutputRoot/$Viewport/$FileName.png"
```
Sanitize route names into stable filenames. Preserve the original hash in the matrix so a reviewer can navigate back to the exact state.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add ignored-output rules and failure guidance.**
Ignore only the generated rehearsal directory. If the dev server is unavailable, fail with the exact startup command instead of silently producing empty captures.
- [ ] **Step 4: Document the capture command and review order.**
Update `presentation-visual-review.md` with:
```powershell
pwsh -File scripts/presentation-rehearsal.ps1
```
Review in story order, then inspect any route that shows clipping, stale chrome, unreadable copy, or a changed primary visual.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run the runner and commit.**
```powershell
pwsh -File scripts/presentation-rehearsal.ps1
git diff --check
git add scripts/presentation-rehearsal.ps1 .gitignore docs/runbooks/presentation-visual-review.md
git commit -m "test: add repeatable presentation screenshot rehearsal"
```
---
### Task 3: Add Route-Level Geometry And Chrome Smoke Checks
**Files:**
- Create: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation-rehearsal.test.ts`
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/PresentationRoute.test.tsx`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: the route matrix and existing presentation test helpers.
- Produces: deterministic jsdom coverage for scene identity, expected heading, chat mode, and demo-chrome ownership. Browser-only dimensions remain in the screenshot review.
- [ ] **Step 1: Add a pure route matrix test.**
Import `mainScenes` and assert each scene has the expected count of beats and canonical beat IDs. The test must fail with the scene ID and missing beat when the storyboard changes without a rehearsal update.
- [ ] **Step 2: Add direct-hash route assertions.**
Extend `PresentationRoute.test.tsx` with a table covering at least:
```text
thesis/title
architecture/client
authoring/diagnose
prepared-lifecycle/discover
run-from-deployment/graph
typed-human-boundary/approval
resume-output-evidence/trace
evaluation/cohort
conclusion/questions
```
Assert the visible scene heading and that demo footer controls appear only for Scenes 8–12. Do not assert implementation CSS classes as a proxy for visible behavior.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add a no-accidental-chrome contract.**
Assert that title, problem, architecture, evaluation, and conclusion routes do not render the live target badge, run/retry controls, or prepared-run action. Assert that the prepared lifecycle route keeps its assistant pane and footer ownership without duplicating a run action.
- [ ] **Step 4: Run focused route tests and commit.**
```powershell
pnpm --dir web/apps/console test -- src/presentation/presentation-rehearsal.test.ts src/presentation/PresentationRoute.test.tsx
git add web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation-rehearsal.test.ts web/apps/console/src/presentation/PresentationRoute.test.tsx
git commit -m "test: cover presentation route rehearsal contracts"
```
---
### Task 4: Rehearse The Live And Replay Demo Paths
**Files:**
- Modify: `docs/runbooks/defense-presentation.md`
- Create: `docs/runbooks/presentation-rehearsal-log.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: the existing Python RPC server, `/present` live/replay target selection, Scene 10 start action, Scene 11 approval form, and Scene 12 output/trace views.
- Produces: a dated rehearsal log with submitted and revision-requested outcomes, fallback behavior, and any concrete defects.
- [ ] **Step 1: Rehearse replay first.**
Force replay using the documented session-storage command, then verify:
1. Scene 8 request/send reveals the prepared conversation without claiming a run.
2. Scene 9 staged messages progress through Discover, Draft, Validate, Artifact, and Deployment.
3. Scene 10 exposes the run action and reaches the typed boundary.
4. Scene 11 approval accepts a submitted outcome and a revision-requested outcome.
5. Scene 12 preserves the same run identity and shows output plus trace evidence.
- [ ] **Step 2: Rehearse the live path.**
With the example server running:
```powershell
uv run wf-rpc-server --config examples/lda_report_workflow/wf.config.json --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8765
```
Confirm the live badge, start action, health probe, approval payload, resume action, output, and trace. Record the exact point where live behavior diverges from replay, if it does.
- [ ] **Step 3: Rehearse failure fallback.**
Stop or point the target at an unavailable endpoint. Confirm the UI says replay/fallback rather than claiming a live run, and verify the direct approval/output/trace hashes still render.
- [ ] **Step 4: Record concrete results.**
`presentation-rehearsal-log.md` must contain the date, viewport, target mode, route, operator action, observed result, and classification:
```text
PASS expected behavior confirmed
VISUAL layout/contrast/overflow defect
FACTUAL UI claim does not match evidence
PRODUCT missing capability outside this slice
BLOCKED environment or server prevented the check
```
Product holes belong in the `PRODUCT` category and must not be “fixed” inside this rehearsal slice.
- [ ] **Step 5: Commit the rehearsal log and runbook changes.**
```powershell
git add docs/runbooks/defense-presentation.md docs/runbooks/presentation-rehearsal-log.md
git commit -m "docs: record live and replay presentation rehearsal"
```
---
### Task 5: Perform The Story-Flow Audit
**Files:**
- Create: `docs/runbooks/presentation-story-audit.md`
- Modify: `docs/current_roadmap.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: the screenshot matrix, rehearsal log, `docs/runbooks/defense-presentation.md`, `docs/runbooks/defense-qna.md`, and the existing `random shit/presentation-story-lda.md` as private narrative input when available locally.
- Produces: a short ordered audit of what each scene proves, what it assumes, what is missing, and what should change next.
- [ ] **Step 1: Audit every scene in order.**
For each scene, record exactly four lines:
```markdown
### Scene N — <title>
- Audience takeaway:
- Visible proof:
- Missing or confusing:
- Next action: keep | visual fix | factual fix | product follow-up
```
- [ ] **Step 2: Check transitions, not only isolated screenshots.**
Review these transitions explicitly:
- Scene 1 → 2: goal becomes problem.
- Scene 5 → 6: lifecycle vocabulary becomes architecture.
- Scene 7 → 8: authoring surface becomes external-agent request.
- Scene 8 → 9: request becomes staged authoring lifecycle.
- Scene 9 → 10: deployment becomes execution, without implying Scene 9 ran anything.
- Scene 10 → 11 → 12: one run reaches a typed human boundary and remains inspectable.
- Scene 13 → 14: evaluation limits become contribution and future work.
- [ ] **Step 3: Keep product holes separate.**
Add a final `Product follow-ups` section for missing file browsing, live agent execution, richer trace frames, real source reads, or other holes found during rehearsal. Do not mix these with visual acceptance criteria.
- [ ] **Step 4: Update the roadmap with findings and commit.**
Link the audit and rehearsal log under the rehearsal gate. If the audit finds a concrete visual defect, create a new narrowly scoped visual plan rather than editing this plan retroactively.
```powershell
git add docs/current_roadmap.md docs/runbooks/presentation-story-audit.md
git commit -m "docs: audit presentation story flow"
```
---
### Task 6: Final Verification And Plan Archival
**Files:**
- Modify: `docs/current_roadmap.md`
- Move: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-13-defense-rehearsal-gate.md` to `docs/historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-13-defense-rehearsal-gate.md`
- [ ] **Step 1: Run the focused presentation checks.**
```powershell
pnpm --dir web/apps/console test -- src/presentation/presentation-rehearsal.test.ts src/presentation/PresentationRoute.test.tsx
```
- [ ] **Step 2: Run the complete web gate.**
```powershell
pnpm --dir web test
pnpm --dir web typecheck
pnpm --dir web build
git diff --check
```
The known Vite chunk-size warning is acceptable if no new build failure appears.
- [ ] **Step 3: Confirm the screenshot matrix.**
Verify every matrix route has both viewport captures, no outer page scroll, no clipped headings, no unreadable labels, no accidental demo chrome, and no live claim in replay mode.
- [ ] **Step 4: Request the two-axis review.**
Review the complete range against this plan. Fix Critical and Important findings before archival; record Minor findings in the rehearsal log.
- [ ] **Step 5: Archive and mark complete.**
Update the roadmap to link the historical plan, rehearsal matrix, rehearsal log, and story audit. Move the plan only after the review and verification gates pass.