docs: plan editorial presentation redesign
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Adopt Tailwind Additively For Source-Owned UI
|
||||
|
||||
Status: accepted
|
||||
|
||||
The web workspace will adopt Tailwind and shadcn-compatible conventions for
|
||||
new source-owned chat and presentation primitives because established AI-chat
|
||||
components provide better interaction and accessibility than maintaining a
|
||||
custom message surface. Existing console CSS will not be rewritten wholesale;
|
||||
old styles migrate only when their components are replaced.
|
||||
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep all styling hand-written.**
|
||||
This avoids another styling dependency, but repeats low-level work for chat,
|
||||
forms, focus states, and responsive composition. The existing presentation
|
||||
already demonstrates the cost of one-off component styling.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rewrite the whole console with Tailwind and a component suite.**
|
||||
This creates one styling mechanism eventually, but turns presentation work into
|
||||
a risky console migration. It also lets framework defaults replace deliberate
|
||||
product decisions before those decisions are ready.
|
||||
|
||||
**Adopt a complete AI application shell.**
|
||||
This supplies familiar chat interactions quickly, but also imports model,
|
||||
account, attachment, and transport assumptions that do not match the existing
|
||||
`AgentDriver` and workflow RPC boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Tailwind enters through the official Vite integration without Preflight, so it
|
||||
does not reset existing `/console` CSS. New source-owned primitives may follow
|
||||
shadcn-compatible structure and copy narrowly selected open-source components,
|
||||
while existing surfaces migrate only when replaced. The project retains
|
||||
ownership of component code, accessibility, tokens, and domain behavior.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user