docs: plan editorial presentation redesign
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Use An Editorial Canvas Around Shared Product Surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
Status: accepted
|
||||
|
||||
The defense presentation will keep one warm editorial identity and temporarily
|
||||
expand real shared console components within a persistent presentation frame.
|
||||
It will not switch the entire deck into a dark product theme or maintain
|
||||
presentation-only copies of product UI, because those approaches break
|
||||
narrative continuity and make the demo less credible.
|
||||
|
||||
## Considered Options
|
||||
|
||||
**Switch between light slides and a dark application stage.**
|
||||
This makes product moments visually distinct, but repeated whole-stage theme
|
||||
changes feel like separate applications and make transitions harder to follow.
|
||||
|
||||
**Build presentation-only product replicas.**
|
||||
This gives complete control over appearance, but creates evidence that is
|
||||
visually persuasive while no longer being the actual product surface. Fixes and
|
||||
interaction behavior would also diverge between `/console` and `/present`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the current dashboard shell as the presentation.**
|
||||
This preserves working behavior, but persistent rails, controls, labels, and
|
||||
card grids compete with the argument and consume the limited `1280x720` frame.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The audience view uses one fixed, scalable `1280x720` Editorial Canvas. Shared
|
||||
console graphs, receipts, evidence, and approval forms may expand within it;
|
||||
presentation code owns framing and choreography rather than alternate product
|
||||
implementations. Locally dark terminal, code, or evidence insets remain valid
|
||||
when they communicate content type, but the main sequence does not switch its
|
||||
global theme.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user