lda.chat/lda-wf
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: record presentation discussion craft pass

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-07-09 04:54:27 +07:00 Verified
parent 645e4ffbf1
commit 7d39df59b3
2 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md
-630
View File
@@ -1,630 +0,0 @@
# Presentation Discussion Craft Implementation Plan
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** Replace the remaining loose discussion chips and flat Q&A modal with a clearer presenter-ready discussion layer that supports defense questions without looking like generic slide chrome.
**Architecture:** Keep the existing `discussionBranches` data and navigation model. Refactor only the presentation components that render discussion affordances: `SceneBody` owns the per-scene question rail, and `DiscussionPanel` owns the modal hierarchy. CSS changes stay in `presentation.css`; the demo workflow layout and replay state are not part of this slice.
**Tech Stack:** React, TypeScript, Vitest, Testing Library, existing presentation CSS, `npx -y impeccable detect` rendered-route scan, Playwright CLI screenshot smoke.
## Global Constraints
- Do not change discussion branch ids, route hashes, or Q&A copy in `storyboard.ts`.
- Do not change demo workflow replay, graph layout, or evidence inspector behavior.
- Do not introduce a component library in this slice.
- Avoid the known slop patterns: pill-only chip pile, side-stripe callout, wide diffuse card shadows, and all-caps body text.
- Keep keyboard/focus behavior for the discussion dialog intact.
- Add comments only around non-obvious layout decisions.
---
## Current Findings
The demo proof layout is now structurally acceptable. The remaining weak presentation surfaces are:
1. Bottom discussion chips look detached from the slide and read as generic tag pills.
2. Q&A modal presents useful content, but hierarchy is flat: title, evidence, summary, answer, note, detail all compete.
3. `impeccable detect` still flags rendered presentation routes for low contrast and generic generated-UI tells. Some contrast warnings are detector sensitivity over gradients, but the discussion layer can still avoid obvious patterns.
This slice should make discussion feel like a deliberate defense control: a small rail of available examiner questions, and a modal that clearly separates answer, evidence, and presenter-only note.
---
## File Structure
- Modify `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.tsx`
- Replace raw button pile in `DiscussionLinks` with a labelled rail and list semantics.
- Modify `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx`
- Pin rail semantics and branch metadata rendering.
- Modify `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.tsx`
- Add explicit Q&A layout sections: question header, answer card, evidence/provenance card, presenter-note card.
- Modify `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx`
- Pin Q&A hierarchy, non-Q&A fallback, and focus trap behavior.
- Modify `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css`
- Replace pill-chip styling with rail styling.
- Replace flat modal card styling with a two-zone editorial dialog.
- Remove side-stripe detail treatment.
- Modify `docs/current_roadmap.md`
- Mark discussion craft pass complete after implementation.
- Move this plan to `docs/historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md` after implementation.
---
### Task 1: Replace Discussion Chips With A Presenter Question Rail
**Files:**
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.tsx`
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx`
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: `discussionBranches`, `openDiscussion(branchId: string)`.
- Produces: `.scene-body__discussion-links` rail with `data-discussion-rail="true"`, a visible label, list semantics, and branch claim labels.
- [ ] **Step 1: Add failing tests for rail semantics**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx`, add these tests inside the existing `describe("SceneBody", ...)` block:
```tsx
it("renders discussion branches as a labelled presenter rail", () => {
const location: PresentationLocation = { kind: "main", sceneId: "positioning", beatId: "landscape", focusPath: [] };
render(
<SceneBody
location={location}
demo={demo}
selectedNodeId={null}
selectNode={noop}
openEvidence={noop}
openDiscussion={noop}
onFocusPathChange={noop}
motionDisabled={false}
/>,
);
const rail = screen.getByLabelText("defense discussion topics");
expect(rail).toHaveAttribute("data-discussion-rail", "true");
expect(within(rail).getByText("Defense questions")).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(within(rail).getByRole("list")).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(within(rail).getByRole("button", { name: /Hosted automation future-work/i })).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it("keeps discussion rail actions wired to branch ids", async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup();
const location: PresentationLocation = { kind: "main", sceneId: "positioning", beatId: "landscape", focusPath: [] };
const openDiscussion = vi.fn();
render(
<SceneBody
location={location}
demo={demo}
selectedNodeId={null}
selectNode={noop}
openEvidence={noop}
openDiscussion={openDiscussion}
onFocusPathChange={noop}
motionDisabled={false}
/>,
);
await user.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: /Hosted automation future-work/i }));
expect(openDiscussion).toHaveBeenCalledWith("hosted-automation");
});
```
- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests and verify they fail**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx
```
Expected: fail because the rail label, list semantics, and `data-discussion-rail` do not exist yet.
- [ ] **Step 3: Refactor `DiscussionLinks` markup**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.tsx`, replace the `DiscussionLinks` return block with:
```tsx
return (
<aside className="scene-body__discussion-links" aria-label="defense discussion topics" data-discussion-rail="true">
<span className="scene-body__discussion-label">Defense questions</span>
<ul className="scene-body__discussion-list">
{branches.map((branch) => (
<li key={branch.id}>
<button
type="button"
onClick={() => openDiscussion(branch.id)}
>
<span>{branch.title}</span>
<small>{branch.claimClass}</small>
</button>
</li>
))}
</ul>
</aside>
);
```
- [ ] **Step 4: Replace rail CSS**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css`, replace the existing `.scene-body__discussion-links` and `.scene-body__discussion-links button` rules with:
```css
.scene-body__discussion-links {
flex-shrink: 0;
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: auto minmax(0, 1fr);
align-items: center;
gap: 0.7rem;
margin-top: 0.55rem;
border-top: 1px solid color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)) 30%, transparent);
padding-top: 0.45rem;
}
.scene-body__discussion-label {
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 72%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font: 650 0.72rem/1 var(--font-interface);
}
.scene-body__discussion-list {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 0.35rem;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
list-style: none;
}
.scene-body__discussion-links button {
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.45rem;
border: 1px solid color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)) 36%, transparent);
border-radius: 0.55rem;
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)) 72%, transparent);
color: var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65));
padding: 0.34rem 0.55rem;
font: 600 0.74rem/1 var(--font-interface);
}
.scene-body__discussion-links button small {
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 62%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font: 0.68rem/1 var(--font-interface);
}
.scene-body__discussion-links button:hover,
.scene-body__discussion-links button:focus-visible {
border-color: var(--color-intent, oklch(0.53 0.17 250));
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-intent, oklch(0.53 0.17 250)) 8%, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)));
}
```
Remove the old uppercase/tracked/pill styling. Do not add a side stripe or shadow.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run tests and verify they pass**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx
```
Expected: pass.
- [ ] **Step 6: Commit Task 1**
```powershell
git add web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.tsx web/apps/console/src/presentation/SceneBody.test.tsx web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css
git commit -m "fix: turn discussion chips into presenter rail"
```
---
### Task 2: Rebuild Discussion Panel Hierarchy
**Files:**
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.tsx`
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx`
- Modify: `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: existing `DiscussionBranchDefinition` fields.
- Produces: Q&A dialog with `data-discussion-layout="qna" | "context"`, explicit answer/provenance/presenter-note sections, and unchanged focus trap behavior.
- [ ] **Step 1: Add failing tests for modal hierarchy**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx`, add:
```tsx
it("separates Q&A answer, provenance, and presenter note regions", () => {
render(<DiscussionPanel branchId="where-is-ai-agent" onClose={onClose} />);
const dialog = screen.getByRole("dialog");
expect(dialog).toHaveAttribute("data-discussion-layout", "qna");
expect(screen.getByLabelText("short defense answer")).toHaveTextContent(/workflow substrate/i);
expect(screen.getByLabelText("answer expansion")).toHaveTextContent(/planning algorithm/i);
expect(screen.getByLabelText("answer provenance")).toHaveTextContent(/Abstract/i);
expect(screen.getByLabelText("presenter note")).toHaveTextContent(/Answer directly first/i);
});
it("uses context layout for non-Q&A discussion branches", () => {
render(<DiscussionPanel branchId="hosted-automation" onClose={onClose} />);
const dialog = screen.getByRole("dialog");
expect(dialog).toHaveAttribute("data-discussion-layout", "context");
expect(screen.queryByLabelText("short defense answer")).not.toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByLabelText("answer provenance")).toHaveTextContent(/Workflow Automation Platforms/i);
});
```
- [ ] **Step 2: Run tests and verify they fail**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx
```
Expected: fail because `data-discussion-layout` and the labelled regions do not exist yet.
- [ ] **Step 3: Refactor `DiscussionPanel` content**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.tsx`, add:
```tsx
const hasQuestion = branch.question !== undefined;
```
Set these attributes on the dialog root:
```tsx
data-presentation-surface="editorial"
data-discussion-layout={hasQuestion ? "qna" : "context"}
```
Replace the current evidence/summary/Q&A/detail block between `</header>` and the return button with:
```tsx
<section className="discussion-panel__provenance" aria-label="answer provenance">
<span>Evidence</span>
<p>{branch.evidencePointer}</p>
</section>
<p className="discussion-panel__summary">{branch.summary}</p>
{hasQuestion && (
<section className="discussion-panel__qna" aria-label="defense question">
<p className="discussion-panel__question">{branch.question}</p>
{branch.shortAnswer && (
<article className="discussion-panel__answer-card" aria-label="short defense answer">
<span>Short answer</span>
<p>{branch.shortAnswer}</p>
</article>
)}
{branch.expandedAnswer && (
<article className="discussion-panel__answer-card discussion-panel__answer-card--expanded" aria-label="answer expansion">
<span>Expanded answer</span>
<p>{branch.expandedAnswer}</p>
</article>
)}
{branch.speakerHint && (
<aside className="discussion-panel__presenter-note" aria-label="presenter note">
<span>Presenter note</span>
<p>{branch.speakerHint}</p>
</aside>
)}
</section>
)}
{branch.detail && (
<section className="discussion-panel__detail" aria-label="additional context">
<p>
{branch.detail.links?.map((link, index) => (
<span key={link.href}>
{index > 0 && " · "}
<a href={link.href} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">{link.label}</a>
</span>
))}
{branch.detail.links && branch.detail.links.length > 0 ? " — " : ""}
{branch.detail.text}
</p>
</section>
)}
```
Keep the existing focus trap and return button unchanged.
- [ ] **Step 4: Replace discussion panel CSS**
In `web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css`, update the discussion panel block:
1. Replace `.discussion-panel__evidence` rules with `.discussion-panel__provenance` rules:
```css
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__provenance {
display: grid;
gap: 0.2rem;
margin: 0.55rem 0 0;
border: 1px solid color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)) 24%, transparent);
border-radius: 0.6rem;
padding: 0.5rem 0.6rem;
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)) 82%, white);
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__provenance span,
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__answer-card span {
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 68%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font: 700 0.68rem/1 var(--font-interface);
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__provenance p {
margin: 0;
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 84%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font-size: 0.82rem;
}
```
2. Replace `.discussion-panel__qna`, `.discussion-panel__question`, `.discussion-panel__short-answer`, and `.discussion-panel__expanded-answer` rules with:
```css
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__qna {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1.1fr) minmax(14rem, 0.9fr);
gap: 0.7rem;
margin: 0.85rem 0;
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__question {
grid-column: 1 / -1;
margin: 0;
color: var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65));
font-size: 1.15rem;
font-weight: 760;
line-height: 1.15;
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__answer-card {
display: grid;
gap: 0.35rem;
border: 1px solid color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-intent, oklch(0.53 0.17 250)) 26%, transparent);
border-radius: 0.75rem;
padding: 0.7rem;
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-intent, oklch(0.53 0.17 250)) 6%, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)));
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__answer-card--expanded {
border-color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)) 28%, transparent);
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)) 90%, white);
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__answer-card p {
margin: 0;
color: var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65));
line-height: 1.42;
}
```
3. Replace `.discussion-panel__presenter-note` rules with:
```css
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__presenter-note {
display: grid;
gap: 0.3rem;
margin: 0;
border: 1px dashed color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-human, oklch(0.68 0.17 55)) 42%, transparent);
border-radius: 0.75rem;
padding: 0.7rem;
background: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-human, oklch(0.68 0.17 55)) 9%, var(--color-editorial-paper, oklch(0.975 0.012 82)));
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__presenter-note span {
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-human, oklch(0.68 0.17 55)) 70%, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)));
font: 700 0.68rem/1 var(--font-interface);
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__presenter-note p {
margin: 0;
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 84%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font-size: 0.84rem;
line-height: 1.35;
}
```
4. Replace `.discussion-panel__detail` to remove the side stripe:
```css
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__detail {
margin: 0.65rem 0 0;
border: 1px solid color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)) 24%, transparent);
border-radius: 0.65rem;
padding: 0.6rem;
color: color-mix(in oklch, var(--color-editorial-ink, oklch(0.19 0.015 65)) 82%, var(--color-editorial-muted, oklch(0.48 0.025 65)));
font-size: 0.85rem;
}
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__detail p {
margin: 0;
}
```
5. Add a narrow-height fallback:
```css
@media (max-height: 760px) {
.discussion-panel[data-presentation-surface="editorial"] .discussion-panel__qna {
grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr);
}
}
```
- [ ] **Step 5: Run tests and verify they pass**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx
```
Expected: pass.
- [ ] **Step 6: Commit Task 2**
```powershell
git add web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.tsx web/apps/console/src/presentation/DiscussionPanel.test.tsx web/apps/console/src/presentation/presentation.css
git commit -m "fix: clarify defense qna modal hierarchy"
```
---
### Task 3: Detector And Screenshot Verification
**Files:**
- Modify: `docs/current_roadmap.md`
- Move: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md` to `docs/historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: rendered `/present` route and `impeccable detect` CLI.
- Produces: roadmap completion item and archived plan.
- [ ] **Step 1: Run focused presentation tests**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation
```
Expected: all presentation tests pass.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run typecheck and build**
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console typecheck
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console build
```
Expected: typecheck clean; build passes with only the known Vite chunk-size warning if it appears.
- [ ] **Step 3: Run rendered detector smoke**
Run:
```powershell
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#scene/positioning/landscape
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/where-is-ai-agent
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/hosted-automation
```
Expected:
- No `gpt-thin-border-wide-shadow` findings.
- No `all-caps-body` finding introduced by the rail or modal.
- No `side-stripe`/border-left finding on `discussion-panel__detail`.
- Existing gradient contrast warnings may remain on scene captions; record them in the report rather than trying to fix unrelated surfaces.
- [ ] **Step 4: Capture screenshots**
Run:
```powershell
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft open "http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#scene/positioning/landscape"
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft resize 1280 720
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft screenshot --filename web/apps/console/.visual-smoke/discussion-craft-03-rail.png
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft open "http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/where-is-ai-agent"
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft screenshot --filename web/apps/console/.visual-smoke/discussion-craft-qna.png
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft open "http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/hosted-automation"
pnpx --package @playwright/cli playwright-cli -s=discussion-craft screenshot --filename web/apps/console/.visual-smoke/discussion-craft-context.png
```
Acceptance criteria:
- Scene discussion affordance reads as a presenter rail, not a pile of tags.
- Q&A modal answer can be read in this order: question, short answer, expanded answer, provenance, presenter note.
- Context-only branches still render cleanly without empty Q&A boxes.
- At `1280x720`, the modal does not cover its own return button or require page scroll.
- [ ] **Step 5: Update roadmap**
In `docs/current_roadmap.md`, replace item 8 under `Next presentation visual slices` with:
```md
8. Completed: discussion craft pass replaced detached branch chips with a
presenter question rail and rebuilt Q&A modals around answer,
provenance, and presenter-note hierarchy. Implementation:
[`presentation discussion craft`](historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md).
9. Presentation craft pass: tune remaining motion, evidence receipt
placement, route-level caption contrast, and graph visual language after
the discussion layer is stable.
```
- [ ] **Step 6: Archive the plan**
Run:
```powershell
Move-Item docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md docs/historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md
```
Verify:
```powershell
rg -n "presentation discussion craft|2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft" docs/current_roadmap.md docs/superpowers/plans docs/historical/superpowers/plans
```
Expected:
- Roadmap points to `historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md`.
- No active copy remains under `docs/superpowers/plans/`.
- [ ] **Step 7: Final verification and commit**
Run:
```powershell
git diff --check
git status --short
```
Expected: only roadmap and plan movement are unstaged.
Commit:
```powershell
git add docs/current_roadmap.md docs/historical/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md
git add -u docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-09-presentation-discussion-craft.md
git commit -m "docs: record presentation discussion craft pass"
```
---
## Final Verification
Run:
```powershell
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console test -- src/presentation
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console typecheck
pnpm --dir web --filter @lda/console build
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#scene/positioning/landscape
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/where-is-ai-agent
npx -y impeccable detect --json --gpt --gemini http://127.0.0.1:5173/present#discuss/hosted-automation
git diff --check
git status --short
```
Expected:
- Presentation tests pass.
- Typecheck passes.
- Build passes with only known chunk-size warning if present.
- Detector shows no new discussion-layer slop findings. Existing unrelated route-level contrast warnings can be reported.
- `git diff --check` is clean.
- `git status --short` is clean.
## Self-Review
- Spec coverage: covers discussion rail, modal hierarchy, CSS slop removal, detector smoke, screenshots, and roadmap archival.
- Placeholder scan: no placeholder markers or vague implementation instructions are present.
- Type consistency: uses existing `DiscussionBranchDefinition`, `openDiscussion(branchId: string)`, and existing route hashes unchanged.
- Scope check: does not change demo workflow replay, graph layout, chat replacement, source data, or Q&A copy.