slop on my agent skills removed + notes

examples/agent_challenges/report_workflow_challenge/readme.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+delete and replace file if youve done it.
+
+THE OG. the GOAT. the latest and greatest.
+
+examples\demo_workflow.py
+
+the flow is docs -> foreach summarize -> email by flag.
+
+also look at report_workflow, and other workflows in example.
+
+im expanding it to the biggest and most challenging:
+
+docs collection -> foreach summarize by person / point
+|-> render markdown -> send to email
+|-> foreach (collect by person -> render markdown -> lookup name -> send to email)
+-> save somewhere
+
+this exercises a lot of things.
+
+to make shit easy lets have the docs VERY structured. Each doc is by topic(?), points by person(?), or some better system.

skills/wf-workflow/references/direct-plan-import.md

@@ -123,6 +123,3 @@ The plan file is the low-level workflow model. It is not a draft workspace.
 - Do not omit deployment bindings for ordinary sources. Platform sources such
   as `wf.std` may be omitted or self-bound, but configured sources usually need
   explicit deployment bindings.
-- If a challenge asks what you read, source files, tests, and examples count as
-  product code. Report `product_code: true` if you inspected them for plan shape
-  or capability behavior.

skills/wf-workflow/references/system-model.md

@@ -69,14 +69,3 @@ Use trace commands only with explicit bounds:
 ```bash
 wf run trace <run_id> --from 0 --limit 25
 ```
-
-## Agent Reporting
-
-If a challenge asks whether product code was read, count source files, tests,
-and examples as product code. Reading `tests/...` to learn plan shape means
-`product_code: true`.
-
-Do not run repository-wide `ruff`, `basedpyright`, or test suites unless the
-task asks for repo changes. For workflow operation tasks, validate with `wf`
-commands: capability inspection, draft/deployment validation, run status, and
-bounded trace reads.