feat: add neutral architecture overview beat
This commit is contained in:
@@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ Keep Scene 5 conceptual. Scene 9 applies this vocabulary to the prepared example
|
||||
|
||||
### Scene 6: Zoom through the implemented architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Route:** `architecture/client`, `architecture/api`, `architecture/runtime`, then `architecture/node-use`
|
||||
**Route:** `architecture/overview`, `architecture/client`, `architecture/api`, `architecture/runtime`, then `architecture/node-use`<br>
|
||||
**Time:** 3:55-4:50
|
||||
**Evidence:** Supported
|
||||
|
||||
Say:
|
||||
|
||||
> Human operators and external agents enter through the same public lifecycle surface. WorkflowApi owns lifecycle operations; JSON-RPC adapts requests without owning domain behavior. WorkflowServer composes records, provider-neutral capabilities, WorkflowApi, and the execution kernel; provider behavior remains outside the core. A NodeUse resolves bindings, invokes its NodeDef handler, reduces output into state, appends a trace frame, and routes the outcome.
|
||||
> First, the implemented architecture spine and its ownership boundaries. Humans and agents share one public lifecycle surface. WorkflowApi owns lifecycle operations; JSON-RPC only adapts transport. WorkflowServer composes records, capabilities, API, and kernel; providers remain outside the core. NodeUse invokes a NodeDef handler, reduces state, records trace, and routes the declared outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
The NodeUse sequence is documented in the thesis runtime diagram and narrative ([lines 706-750](../thesis/system-design-implementation.md#workflow-core-model)).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user