docs: refine presentation opening framing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,10 +28,11 @@ Planner -> Tool Surface -> Workflow Platform
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Known products should appear only where they clarify the model:
|
Known products should appear only where they clarify the model:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `Codex`, `Claude`, and `ChatGPT` sit under `Planner`.
|
- `Codex`, `Claude`, and `OpenCode` sit under `Planner`.
|
||||||
- `CLI`, `MCP`, and `APIs` sit under `Tool Surface`.
|
- `CLI`, `MCP`, and `APIs` sit under `Tool Surface`.
|
||||||
- `lda.chat` is highlighted as the submitted workflow-platform/substrate
|
- The submitted work is highlighted under `Workflow Platform` as the local
|
||||||
implementation.
|
workflow substrate implementation. The decomposition should not rely on the
|
||||||
|
project name alone to explain the category.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Do not introduce `wf` CLI branding in the opening. The CLI appears later as one
|
Do not introduce `wf` CLI branding in the opening. The CLI appears later as one
|
||||||
implementation surface.
|
implementation surface.
|
||||||
@@ -65,12 +66,12 @@ Primary visual:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
```text
|
||||||
Planner Tool Surface Workflow Platform
|
Planner Tool Surface Workflow Platform
|
||||||
Codex / Claude CLI / MCP / APIs lda.chat
|
Codex / Claude CLI / MCP / APIs submitted substrate
|
||||||
ChatGPT Typed · Durable · Inspectable
|
OpenCode Typed · Durable · Inspectable
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The workflow-platform block should become dominant. `lda.chat` is branding here;
|
The workflow-platform block should become dominant. Avoid `wf` branding here;
|
||||||
it is not replaced by `wf`.
|
the CLI is an implementation surface introduced later.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Required behavior:
|
Required behavior:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -84,9 +85,9 @@ Required behavior:
|
|||||||
Speaker-script intent:
|
Speaker-script intent:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```text
|
```text
|
||||||
By AI agent, I do not mean I built a new Codex or Claude. Existing agents can
|
By AI agent, I do not mean I built a new Codex, Claude, or OpenCode. Existing
|
||||||
already plan and call tools. I focused on the workflow platform layer: the part
|
agents can already plan and call tools. I focused on the workflow platform
|
||||||
that makes their work typed, durable, inspectable, and reusable.
|
layer: the part that makes their work typed, durable, inspectable, and reusable.
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Scene 2: From Action Sequence To Automation
|
## Scene 2: From Action Sequence To Automation
|
||||||
@@ -170,15 +171,20 @@ Suggested component split:
|
|||||||
- `ProblemLoopScene`: action sequence vs reusable automation.
|
- `ProblemLoopScene`: action sequence vs reusable automation.
|
||||||
- Optional shared `ConceptIcon` if icons stay inline/SVG.
|
- Optional shared `ConceptIcon` if icons stay inline/SVG.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The visuals can be hand-authored SVG/CSS. Do not add a new icon package unless
|
Prefer source-owned reusable presentation primitives for chips, icon plaques,
|
||||||
the implementation plan justifies it.
|
timeline steps, and placeholder surfaces. If a component library is introduced
|
||||||
|
later for chat or product surfaces, the opening visuals should be able to reuse
|
||||||
|
that visual language instead of growing a separate ad-hoc illustration style.
|
||||||
|
Hand-authored SVG/CSS is acceptable for a small number of stable concept icons,
|
||||||
|
but do not add a new icon package unless the implementation plan justifies it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Tests
|
## Tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Add tests that pin behavior without overfitting animation details:
|
Add tests that pin behavior without overfitting animation details:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Scene 1 renders `Planner`, `Tool Surface`, `Workflow Platform`, known agent
|
- Scene 1 renders `Planner`, `Tool Surface`, `Workflow Platform`, known agent
|
||||||
names, `lda.chat`, and `Typed · Durable · Inspectable`.
|
names, the submitted substrate/platform block, and
|
||||||
|
`Typed · Durable · Inspectable`.
|
||||||
- Scene 1 exposes a `Where is the AI agent?` discussion action.
|
- Scene 1 exposes a `Where is the AI agent?` discussion action.
|
||||||
- Scene 2 renders `Action sequence` and `Reusable automation`.
|
- Scene 2 renders `Action sequence` and `Reusable automation`.
|
||||||
- Scene 2 uses simple verbs: `design`, `save`, `connect`, `run`, `inspect`.
|
- Scene 2 uses simple verbs: `design`, `save`, `connect`, `run`, `inspect`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user