docs: complete presentation demo chrome slice

This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-07-12 16:09:00 +07:00 Verified
parent 7fb48f0f96
commit db6e5c4de6
6 changed files with 121 additions and 16 deletions
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# Task 6 Report
## Scope
Completed the final presentation demo chrome integration task without changing
production APIs or adding product behavior.
- Added route-level regressions for Scene 8 -> Scene 10 operation -> Scene 10
graph -> title backtracking, stale launch/replay chrome, and approval paused
label removal after submit.
- Added CSS contract assertions for compact footer rail sizing and removal of
`.demo-run-launch-control`.
- Updated `web/README.md` to document the Scenes 8-12 footer rail and removed
stale Scene 8 probing and Scene 10 in-scene launch claims.
- Marked Scene 10 factual graph/proof work complete in the roadmap, linked the
design and implementation plan, and kept file-preview work deferred.
- Moved the completed Scene 10 plan to `docs/historical/superpowers/plans/`.
## Verification
- Focused route/CSS tests: passed, 2 files, 63 tests.
- Full web test gate: passed, 91 files, 715 tests.
- Web typecheck: passed for console, RPC package, and server.
- Web build: passed. Vite emitted the existing chunk-size warning for the main
bundle; no build failure occurred.
- `git diff --check`: passed.
Screenshots were captured at 1280x720 after 2-second waits using the existing
running server and Playwright tooling. Files were written outside the
repository under `%TEMP%`:
- `task-6-title.png`
- `task-6-scene-8.png`
- `task-6-operation.png`
- `task-6-approval.png`
- `task-6-output.png`
## Review
Two-axis repository review against `46f25b45`:
- Standards axis: no findings.
- Spec axis: no missing requirements, scope creep, or incorrect Task 6
implementation findings.
## Deviations And Concerns
- The first parallel full-gate invocation showed two existing route-test
failures caused by cross-file Vitest interference. The required rerun with
servers unchanged passed completely.
- Browser console output contained one `favicon.ico` 404 from the existing dev
server. No presentation route error was observed.