feat: add debug profile for agent challenge UX mining
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
|
||||
## Instruction Profile: debug
|
||||
|
||||
Use the supplied skills under `.agent/skills/` plus public `wf` commands. This
|
||||
profile is for product UX diagnosis, so keep working through public discovery
|
||||
longer than you would in a normal benchmark run.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not read repository examples, tests, source, prior trials, or prior stores
|
||||
unless you are genuinely blocked. "Genuinely blocked" means all of these are
|
||||
true:
|
||||
|
||||
- You tried the relevant `wf --help` or subcommand `--help`.
|
||||
- You tried `wf schema` or the specific `wf schema <name>` form when the issue
|
||||
is about document shape.
|
||||
- You tried validation or inspection commands such as `wf draft validate`,
|
||||
`wf draft compile`, `wf deploy validate`, `wf cap inspect`, or bounded
|
||||
`wf run trace` when those commands apply.
|
||||
- You recorded the exact failing command, error text, and what you expected.
|
||||
- You cannot proceed with public commands, supplied skills, challenge files, and
|
||||
validation output alone.
|
||||
|
||||
If you escalate beyond public surfaces after being genuinely blocked, report it
|
||||
honestly in the `read` flags and explain why. Never read or copy adjacent trial
|
||||
answers, prior result files, prior stores, or complete ready-made solution plans
|
||||
for the same challenge.
|
||||
|
||||
In the final `challenge_report`, include a `ux_issues_found` list. Use an empty
|
||||
list if there were no issues. Each issue should be concrete and evidence-backed:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
ux_issues_found:
|
||||
- command: "wf draft add-step ..."
|
||||
issue: "Assumed --name existed; command requires --step."
|
||||
evidence: "CLI returned: No such option --name"
|
||||
workaround: "Used --step render"
|
||||
suggested_fix: "Mention --step in help/example"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Log command typos, wrong assumptions, missing aliases, confusing help text,
|
||||
schema/document-shape confusion, validation errors that were hard to repair,
|
||||
and any point where you considered reading implementation code because public
|
||||
surfaces were insufficient. A successful final run should still report the
|
||||
issues and failed attempts that happened along the way.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user