12 KiB
wf CLI Docs And Skill Implementation Plan
For agentic workers: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (
- [ ]) syntax for tracking.
Goal: Create real user-facing wf CLI documentation and a small agent skill, then update wf explain cards to reference those docs instead of planning specs.
Architecture: Treat docs/superpowers/* as planning history only, not runtime/user guidance. The canonical CLI reference should live at docs/wf_cli.md; the optional repo-local skill should live at skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md and point agents to the real doc plus the safest command flow.
Tech Stack: Markdown docs, existing wf_cli.explain registry, pytest, ruff.
Scope
Create:
docs/wf_cli.md
skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md
Modify:
docs/README.md
src/wf_cli/explain/entries.py
tests/wf_cli/test_explain.py
Do not add command aliases in this slice. wf cap and wf deploy are the real registered command names.
Do not link wf explain runtime guidance to:
docs/superpowers/specs/*
docs/superpowers/plans/*
Those are planning artifacts, not user/operator docs.
Task 1: Add Real CLI User Documentation
Files:
-
Create:
docs/wf_cli.md -
Modify:
docs/README.md -
Step 1: Create
docs/wf_cli.md
Create docs/wf_cli.md:
# wf CLI
`wf` is the workflow platform command-line interface. It is a second front door
beside MCP: useful for shell-driven authoring, local validation, file-based
patches, and agent workflows that do better with commands than giant MCP
schemas.
`wf` uses the same config/store stack as the MCP server in v1:
```bash
wf --config wf_mcp.config.json <command>
If --config is omitted, wf_mcp.config.json is used.
Output Policy
JSON is the default output format for every command.
List/discovery commands may support:
--format json # complete machine-readable payload
--format ids # one identifier per line
--format compact # one concise line per item
Detail and mutation commands are JSON-only unless documented otherwise.
There is no table format in v1.
Lifecycle
The normal CLI workflow is:
- Inspect capabilities.
- Create a draft workspace from a capability.
- Inspect or patch the draft.
- Validate the draft.
- Save an artifact.
- Save a deployment with source bindings.
- Validate the deployment.
- Run the deployment.
- Read bounded trace detail only when debugging.
Capability Discovery
List capabilities:
wf cap list
wf cap list --source wf.std --format ids
wf cap list --query echo --format compact
Inspect one capability:
wf cap inspect wf.std.concat
inspect returns the full contract, including wrapper_hints when available.
Hints are scaffolding, not semantic guarantees.
Draft Workspaces
Create a draft from a capability:
wf draft create-from-capability concat_ws wf.std.concat --name concat_ws
List and inspect drafts:
wf draft list --format compact
wf draft inspect concat_ws
wf draft inspect concat_ws --include-draft
Patch a draft with RFC 6902 JSON Patch:
wf draft patch concat_ws \
--revision 1 \
--input '[{"op":"replace","path":"/name","value":"concat_ws_v2"}]'
Validate:
wf draft validate concat_ws
Save as an artifact:
wf draft save concat_ws \
--artifact concat_ws \
--version 1 \
--title "Concat Workflow" \
--outcome ok \
--binding wf.std=wf.std
Use --kind wrapper when saving a callable wrapper artifact:
wf draft save concat_ws \
--artifact concat_wrapper \
--version 1 \
--title "Concat Wrapper" \
--kind wrapper \
--outcome ok \
--binding wf.std=wf.std
Artifacts
List and inspect artifacts:
wf artifact list --format ids
wf artifact list --kind wrapper --format compact
wf artifact inspect concat_ws 1
Artifacts are immutable saved workflow definitions. List output is compact by
design; use inspect for full details.
Deployments
Save a deployment from flags:
wf deploy save concat_ws.default \
--artifact concat_ws \
--version 1 \
--binding wf.std=wf.std
Save a deployment from JSON:
wf deploy save --input-file deployment.json
List, inspect, validate, and delete:
wf deploy list --format compact
wf deploy inspect concat_ws.default
wf deploy validate concat_ws.default
wf deploy validate concat_ws.default --live
wf deploy delete concat_ws.default
--live performs opt-in upstream liveness checks. Static validation can pass
even when a live external source is temporarily unreachable.
Runs And Traces
Start a deployment:
wf run start concat_ws.default \
--input '{"items":["red","blue"],"separator":" + "}'
Inspect a run without trace detail:
wf run inspect run_123
Read a bounded trace slice:
wf run trace run_123 --from 0 --limit 25
Trace output can be large. Always request a bounded range.
Explain
Explain stable diagnostic/error codes:
wf explain source_missing
wf explain deployment_unrunnable --format markdown
wf explain --input-file validation-output.json
wf explain --list --format compact
wf explain is exact-match and docs-backed. It is not fuzzy search and does not
generate prose.
Common Diagnostics
source_missing
A required logical source is not available or not bound.
Check:
wf deploy inspect <deployment_id>
wf cap list
wf deploy validate <deployment_id> --live
binding_missing
A deployment is missing a required logical-to-concrete source binding.
Check artifact requirements, then save the deployment with all required bindings:
wf deploy save <deployment_id> \
--artifact <artifact_id> \
--version <version> \
--binding <logical>=<concrete>
capability_missing
The bound source does not expose a required capability.
Check:
wf cap list --source <source_id>
wf deploy inspect <deployment_id>
schema_changed
A saved dependency schema no longer matches the live capability. Inspect the live capability, patch the draft or wrapper, and save a new artifact version.
deployment_unrunnable
The deployment failed validation and should not be run yet.
Check:
wf deploy validate <deployment_id>
wf explain --input-file validation-output.json
Known Limits
- The CLI reuses
wf_mcpservice/config/store wiring in v1. - Config loading registers stores and connections, but not arbitrary in-memory
test
NodeSpecfunctions. - Targeted draft editing helpers such as
wf draft step addare not in v1. wfdoes not replace MCP resources/prompts or interactive MCP clients.
- [ ] **Step 2: Add CLI doc to docs index**
Modify `docs/README.md` under `## Current Overview` or a new `## CLI` section:
```markdown
- [`wf_cli.md`](wf_cli.md): workflow platform CLI commands, output formats,
lifecycle flow, and common diagnostics.
- Step 3: Verify doc links manually
Run:
Test-Path docs/wf_cli.md
Select-String -Path docs/README.md -Pattern 'wf_cli.md'
Expected: both show the new doc exists and is indexed.
Task 2: Add Repo-Local Agent Skill
Files:
-
Create:
skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md -
Step 1: Create
skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md
Create skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md:
---
name: wf-cli
description: Use when authoring, validating, deploying, running, or debugging workflows through the repo-local `wf` CLI.
---
# wf CLI
Use the `wf` CLI when an agent needs a shell-friendly workflow lifecycle:
1. Discover capabilities.
2. Create or patch a draft workspace.
3. Validate the draft.
4. Save an artifact.
5. Save and validate a deployment.
6. Run the deployment.
7. Read bounded trace slices only when debugging.
Canonical docs:
- `docs/wf_cli.md`
- `docs/workflow_capabilities.md`
- `docs/workflow_drafts.md`
- `docs/workflow_artifacts.md`
- `docs/durable_run_operations.md`
## Core Commands
```bash
wf cap list --format ids
wf cap inspect <capability>
wf draft create-from-capability <workspace_id> <capability>
wf draft inspect <workspace_id> --include-draft
wf draft patch <workspace_id> --revision <n> --input-file patch.json
wf draft validate <workspace_id>
wf draft save <workspace_id> --artifact <artifact_id> --version <n> --title <title>
wf deploy save <deployment_id> --artifact <artifact_id> --version <n> --binding <logical>=<concrete>
wf deploy validate <deployment_id>
wf run start <deployment_id> --input-file input.json
wf run trace <run_id> --from 0 --limit 25
Rules
- Prefer
--input-filefor large JSON. - Prefer
--format idsor--format compactfor discovery. - Do not request unbounded traces.
- Do not treat wrapper hints as semantic guarantees.
- If validation fails, run
wf explain <code>orwf explain --input-file <validation-output.json>. - Do not use docs under
docs/superpowers/as user-facing runtime guidance.
- [ ] **Step 2: Do not wire skill installation**
Do not add marketplace/plugin installation logic in this slice. This repo-local
skill is a source document for future packaging; it is not automatically active
until a user installs or copies it into their agent environment.
## Task 3: Update `wf explain` Doc References
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_cli/explain/entries.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_cli/test_explain.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: Add tests that all explain doc refs are user-facing and existing**
Append to `tests/wf_cli/test_explain.py`:
```python
from pathlib import Path
def test_explain_related_docs_do_not_point_to_planning_artifacts() -> None:
for entry in DEFAULT_EXPLAIN_REGISTRY.list_full_entries():
for related_doc in entry.related_docs:
assert "docs/superpowers/" not in related_doc
def test_explain_related_doc_files_exist() -> None:
repo_root = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
for entry in DEFAULT_EXPLAIN_REGISTRY.list_full_entries():
for related_doc in entry.related_docs:
path_text = related_doc.split("#", 1)[0]
if path_text.startswith("docs/"):
assert (repo_root / path_text).exists(), path_text
- Step 2: Add registry full-entry accessor
Modify src/wf_cli/explain/registry.py:
def list_full_entries(self) -> list[ExplainCard]:
"""Return full cards for internal validation/tests."""
return list(self._entries.values())
- Step 3: Update explain cards to use
docs/wf_cli.md
Modify src/wf_cli/explain/entries.py:
related_docs=[
"docs/wf_cli.md#deployments",
"docs/workflow_capabilities.md",
],
Use these mappings:
source_missing -> docs/wf_cli.md#common-diagnostics, docs/workflow_capabilities.md
source_unreachable -> docs/wf_cli.md#deployments, docs/wf_mcp_troubleshooting.md
binding_missing -> docs/wf_cli.md#deployments, docs/workflow_artifacts.md
capability_missing -> docs/wf_cli.md#capability-discovery, docs/workflow_capabilities.md
schema_changed -> docs/wf_cli.md#common-diagnostics, docs/schema_validation.md
deployment_unrunnable -> docs/wf_cli.md#common-diagnostics, docs/current_roadmap.md
- Step 4: Run explain tests
Run:
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_explain.py -q
Expected: pass.
Task 4: Verification
Files:
-
No new files unless lint/format requires cleanup.
-
Step 1: Run focused CLI tests
Run:
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli -q
Expected: all CLI tests pass.
- Step 2: Run focused lint
Run:
uv run ruff check src/wf_cli tests/wf_cli
Expected: no lint errors.
- Step 3: Run focused format check
Run:
uv run ruff format --check src/wf_cli tests/wf_cli
Expected: no formatting changes required. If this fails, run:
uv run ruff format src/wf_cli tests/wf_cli
Then rerun the format check.
- Step 4: Run docs path check
Run:
Test-Path docs/wf_cli.md
Test-Path skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md
rg -n "docs/superpowers/" src/wf_cli/explain docs/wf_cli.md skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md
Expected:
docs/wf_cli.mdexists.skills/wf-cli/SKILL.mdexists.rgfinds nodocs/superpowers/runtime guidance references in those paths.
Self-Review Checklist
wf explaincards no longer link todocs/superpowers/specsordocs/superpowers/plans.docs/wf_cli.mdcontains the lifecycle that the CLI actually supports today.docs/README.mdpoints to the new CLI doc.- The skill is repo-local documentation only; no install/packaging behavior was added.
- Tests verify explain-card doc refs are not stale.