docs: plan safe draft transfer

This commit is contained in:
lda
2026-07-29 07:44:01 +07:00 Verified
parent dcb08640cc
commit b84fe02de6
3 changed files with 927 additions and 2 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
# Draft Document Transfer Implementation Plan
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** Export exact draft documents and import them into existing revisioned workspaces through local or remote CLI.
**Architecture:** Add a full-document workspace replacement operation that structurally validates and semantically revalidates the imported draft before one atomic store replacement. Expose it through the protocol-neutral API and Python JSON-RPC client, while export reuses existing full draft inspection.
**Tech Stack:** Python 3.14, Pydantic, revisioned file store, FastAPI JSON-RPC, Typer, pytest.
## Global Constraints
- Import updates an existing workspace; it does not create or rename one.
- Import requires an explicit expected revision.
- Export contains only the stored `draft` JSON object.
- Imported drafts receive fresh semantic status and diagnostics.
- Structurally invalid imports and revision conflicts do not mutate.
- Semantically invalid but structurally valid drafts remain repairable and are persisted with diagnostics.
- Do not use `replace_validated_draft_document` for whole-document import.
- Do not add TypeScript RPC contracts in this slice.
---
### Task 1: Add Full-Document Workspace Replacement
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_artifacts/draft_workspaces/api.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_artifacts/draft_workspaces/__init__.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_artifacts/__init__.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_api/drafts.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_api/service.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_api/surface.py`
- Test: `tests/artifacts/test_draft_workspaces.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Produces: `replace_draft_workspace_document`
- Produces: `WorkflowDraftApi.replace_draft_workspace_document`
- Produces: `WorkflowApi.replace_draft_workspace_document`
- Produces: `WorkflowDraftSurface.replace_draft_workspace_document`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing artifact-layer tests**
Add tests proving:
```python
result = replace_draft_workspace_document(
store,
workspace_id="echo_draft",
revision=1,
draft=replacement,
node_defs_for_draft=lambda _draft: [],
)
assert result["revision"] == 2
assert store.get_workspace("echo_draft").draft["name"] == "replacement"
```
Also add tests for:
- identical draft returns revision 1;
- stale revision returns `revision_conflict`;
- structural Pydantic failure raises without mutation;
- semantically invalid routes are persisted at revision 2 with
`status == "invalid"` and fresh diagnostics.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run artifact tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/artifacts/test_draft_workspaces.py -k "replace_draft_workspace_document" -q
```
Expected: collection fails because the operation is not defined.
- [ ] **Step 3: Implement the artifact operation**
Add:
```python
def replace_draft_workspace_document(
store: DraftWorkspaceStore,
*,
workspace_id: str,
revision: int,
draft: JsonObject,
node_defs_for_draft: NodeDefsForDraft,
) -> JsonObject:
"""Replace and semantically revalidate one complete draft document."""
```
Implementation order:
1. load workspace;
2. return `_revision_conflict_payload` when stale;
3. call `WorkflowDraft.model_validate(draft)` for structural validation;
4. return current summary when `draft == workspace.draft`;
5. call `validate_workflow_draft(draft, node_defs=node_defs_for_draft(draft))`;
6. canonicalize only when validation status is valid;
7. create the next workspace with incremented revision, fresh draft, status,
diagnostics, and timestamp;
8. replace with `expected_revision=revision`;
9. translate store races through `_revision_conflict_payload`.
Export the function through both artifact package `__init__.py` files.
- [ ] **Step 4: Write and run API façade tests**
In `tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py`, add one test that registers a
capability, imports a draft using it, and asserts current capability definitions
drive validation. Add a semantically invalid import test proving diagnostics
are refreshed instead of copied from the old workspace.
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "replace_draft_workspace_document" -q
```
Expected before façade implementation: FAIL with missing method.
- [ ] **Step 5: Thread the operation through API and surface**
Add this signature to `WorkflowDraftApi`, `WorkflowApi`, and
`WorkflowDraftSurface`:
```python
async def replace_draft_workspace_document(
*,
workspace_id: str,
revision: int,
draft: dict[str, Any],
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Replace and semantically revalidate one complete workspace draft."""
```
`WorkflowDraftApi` delegates to the artifact operation with
`node_defs_for_draft=self._node_defs_for_draft`. `WorkflowApi` delegates to
`self.drafts`.
- [ ] **Step 6: Run focused tests and commit**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/artifacts/test_draft_workspaces.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "replace_draft_workspace_document" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
Commit:
```bash
git add src/wf_artifacts src/wf_api tests/artifacts/test_draft_workspaces.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py
git commit -m "feat: replace complete draft documents safely"
```
### Task 2: Expose Full Replacement Through Python JSON-RPC
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_transport_rpc_http/models.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_transport_rpc_http/__init__.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_transport_rpc_http/methods/drafts.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_transport_rpc_http/client/drafts.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_app.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_client.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Produces: `ReplaceDraftWorkspaceDocumentParams`
- Produces RPC method: `workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document`
- Produces client method: `RpcDraftClientMixin.replace_draft_workspace_document`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing RPC application test**
Create a workspace, then call:
```python
result = await _rpc(
client,
"workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document",
{
"workspace_id": "report",
"revision": 1,
"draft": replacement,
},
)
assert result["result"]["revision"] == 2
```
Inspect the workspace with `include_draft=True` and assert exact imported
content. Add a malformed `draft=[]` request test that expects JSON-RPC parameter
validation failure without mutation.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run RPC application tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_app.py -k "replace_document" -q
```
Expected: method-not-found failure.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add the request model and RPC method**
Add:
```python
class ReplaceDraftWorkspaceDocumentParams(RpcParamsModel):
workspace_id: str = Field(min_length=1)
revision: int = Field(ge=1)
draft: dict[str, Any]
```
Export it from `wf_transport_rpc_http.__init__`. Register
`workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document` in `methods/drafts.py`, delegating
to `server.api.replace_draft_workspace_document` and using the existing
`WorkflowRpcError` translation.
- [ ] **Step 4: Write failing client request test**
In `test_client.py`, assert:
```python
await client.replace_draft_workspace_document(
workspace_id="report",
revision=4,
draft=draft,
)
assert calls[-1] == {
"method": "workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document",
"params": {
"workspace_id": "report",
"revision": 4,
"draft": draft,
},
}
```
- [ ] **Step 5: Implement the remote client method**
Add the exact `WorkflowDraftSurface` signature to `RpcDraftClientMixin` and
delegate through `_call("workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document", params)`.
Do not normalize or lower the draft through another model in the client.
- [ ] **Step 6: Run transport tests and commit**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_app.py tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_client.py -k "replace_document" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
Commit:
```bash
git add src/wf_transport_rpc_http tests/wf_transport_rpc_http
git commit -m "feat: expose draft document replacement over rpc"
```
### Task 3: Add Draft Export CLI
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_cli/io.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_cli/test_app.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Produces: `write_json_file(path, payload, *, force)`
- Produces CLI command: `wf draft export WORKSPACE --output PATH [--force]`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing local export tests**
Using a fake handler whose `get_draft_workspace` returns:
```python
{"workspace_id": "report", "revision": 4, "draft": expected_draft}
```
Assert:
- `wf draft export report --output draft.json` exits 0;
- the file parses to `expected_draft`;
- text is indented, sorted, UTF-8, and ends with `\n`;
- handler receives `include_draft=True`;
- existing output fails without `--force`;
- `--force` replaces it;
- a missing parent reports a CLI error.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run export tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_app.py -k "draft_export" -q
```
Expected: command-not-found failure.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add the file writer and command**
In `wf_cli.io`, add:
```python
def write_json_file(
path: Path,
payload: Any,
*,
force: bool,
) -> None:
"""Write formatted JSON while refusing accidental replacement."""
```
Use exclusive mode (`"x"`) unless `force=True`, use UTF-8 and newline
translation explicitly, write `json.dumps(payload, indent=2, sort_keys=True)`
plus `"\n"`, and translate `FileExistsError`/`OSError` to `CliInputError`.
Add the Typer command:
```python
@app.command("export")
def export_draft(
ctx: typer.Context,
workspace_id: Annotated[
str,
typer.Argument(help="Draft workspace id."),
],
output: Annotated[
Path,
typer.Option("--output", help="Destination JSON file."),
],
force: Annotated[
bool,
typer.Option("--force", help="Replace an existing destination file."),
] = False,
) -> None:
```
Fetch with `include_draft=True`, require `payload["draft"]` to be a dictionary,
and call `write_json_file`. Do not call `emit_json`.
- [ ] **Step 4: Add remote-target export test**
Use the existing remote target fixture and assert the RPC request is
`workflow.draft_workspaces.get` with `include_draft: true`. Assert the resulting
file contains only the draft, not workspace metadata.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run CLI tests and commit**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py -k "draft_export" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
Commit:
```bash
git add src/wf_cli/io.py src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py
git commit -m "feat: export draft documents"
```
### Task 4: Add Revision-Checked Draft Import CLI
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_cli/test_app.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: `parse_json_object_file(path, option_name="--file")`
- Consumes: `WorkflowDraftSurface.replace_draft_workspace_document`
- Produces CLI command: `wf draft import WORKSPACE --revision N --file PATH`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing local import tests**
Assert the command:
```text
wf draft import report --revision 4 --file draft.json
```
passes the parsed object unchanged to:
```python
replace_draft_workspace_document(
workspace_id="report",
revision=4,
draft=expected_draft,
)
```
Add CLI-input tests for missing files, malformed JSON, and JSON arrays. Assert
these fail before `load_cli_context` is called.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run import tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_app.py -k "draft_import" -q
```
Expected: command-not-found failure.
- [ ] **Step 3: Implement the import command**
Add:
```python
@app.command("import")
def import_draft(
ctx: typer.Context,
workspace_id: Annotated[
str,
typer.Argument(help="Draft workspace id."),
],
revision: Annotated[
int,
typer.Option("--revision", min=1, help="Expected workspace revision."),
],
input_file: Annotated[
Path,
typer.Option("--file", help="Draft JSON document to import."),
],
) -> None:
```
Parse with `parse_json_object_file(input_file, option_name="--file")` before
loading context. Call the full replacement handler and emit its summary:
```python
draft = parse_json_object_file(input_file, option_name="--file")
context = load_cli_context(ctx)
emit_json(
run_cli_operation(
context,
context.handlers.replace_draft_workspace_document(
workspace_id=workspace_id,
revision=revision,
draft=draft,
),
)
)
```
- [ ] **Step 4: Add remote import and round-trip tests**
Add a remote-target test asserting method
`workflow.draft_workspaces.replace_document` and exact draft payload.
Add one round-trip test:
1. export source workspace;
2. import the file into a different existing workspace;
3. inspect the destination with `include_draft=True`;
4. assert destination `draft` equals the exported object;
5. assert destination workspace ID remains unchanged.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run CLI tests and commit**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py -k "draft_import or draft_export or draft_transfer" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
Commit:
```bash
git add src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py
git commit -m "feat: import draft documents"
```
### Task 5: Update User Documentation And Verify The Slice
**Files:**
- Modify: `skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md`
- Modify: `docs/current_roadmap.md`
- Move: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-safe-compatibility-merges.md`
- Move: `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-29-draft-document-transfer.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Documents: safe map merge, export, and revision-checked import
- [ ] **Step 1: Update CLI skill examples**
Add a concise transfer sequence:
```bash
uv run wf draft export report --output report-draft.json
uv run wf draft import restored --revision 1 --file report-draft.json
uv run wf draft validate restored
```
State that exported files contain only the draft document and that import
targets an already existing workspace. State that semantic-invalid imports are
stored with diagnostics for repair.
- [ ] **Step 2: Update roadmap and archive completed plans**
Add one completed roadmap item linking to both historical plan paths. Move both
plans under:
```text
docs/historical/superpowers/plans/
```
Update any references found by:
```bash
rg -n "2026-07-29-(safe-compatibility-merges|draft-document-transfer)" docs skills
```
- [ ] **Step 3: Run focused and static verification**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/artifacts/test_draft_workspaces.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_app.py tests/wf_transport_rpc_http/test_client.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py -q
uv run ruff check
uv run ruff format --check
uv run basedpyright --level error
git diff --check
```
Expected: all tests pass, formatting is unchanged, Ruff reports no issues,
basedpyright reports zero errors, and diff check is clean.
- [ ] **Step 4: Review the combined implementation**
Invoke the repository code-review workflow against the pre-slice commit. Fix
Critical and Important findings, rerun the affected focused tests, and record
any intentionally deferred Minor findings in the final report.
- [ ] **Step 5: Commit documentation and plan archival**
```bash
git add skills/wf-cli/SKILL.md docs/current_roadmap.md docs/superpowers/plans docs/historical/superpowers/plans
git commit -m "docs: complete safe draft transfer"
```
@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
# Safe Compatibility Merges Implementation Plan
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** Prevent compatibility-map merges from silently changing canonical step and workflow-output bindings.
**Architecture:** Keep the existing map operations, but add semantic preflight in `WorkflowDraftApi` before any patch. Step maps must round-trip their existing canonical lists exactly; workflow-output maps reject only requested sources that identify more than one existing binding.
**Tech Stack:** Python 3.14, Pydantic draft models, revisioned draft workspace store, pytest, Typer.
## Global Constraints
- Preserve canonical ordered binding lists as the source of truth.
- Reject unsafe compatibility merges before mutation.
- Preserve simple representable `--merge` behavior.
- Do not add a new binding model or change runtime binding semantics.
- Stale revision conflicts must win after request-envelope validation.
- Use focused pytest commands before broad verification.
---
### Task 1: Guard Step Input Compatibility Merges
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_api/drafts.py`
- Modify: `src/wf_api/draft_authoring.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Produces: `WorkflowDraftApi._workspace_if_revision_matches`
- Produces: `_require_lossless_step_input_map_round_trip(payload, *, step_id)`
- Preserves: `WorkflowDraftApi.set_step_input_map`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing tests for lossless and lossy input merges**
Add focused tests beside
`test_step_map_helpers_merge_with_existing_bindings`:
```python
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_step_input_map_merge_rejects_canonical_source_fan_out(
tmp_path: Path,
) -> None:
api, _service, authoring = _draft_api(
FileWorkflowArtifactStore(tmp_path / "input_merge_fan_out"),
register_echo=True,
)
await api.create_draft_workspace(
workspace_id="report",
draft=_structured_report_draft(),
)
await authoring.set_step_input_bindings(
workspace_id="report",
revision=1,
step_id="report",
bindings=[
InputPathBinding(
path=GraphSourcePath.state("title"),
target=LocalPath.of("request", "title"),
),
InputPathBinding(
path=GraphSourcePath.state("title"),
target=LocalPath.of("audit", "title"),
),
],
)
before = await api.get_draft_workspace(
workspace_id="report",
include_draft=True,
)
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="complete canonical binding list"):
await api.set_step_input_map(
workspace_id="report",
revision=2,
step_id="report",
input_map={"input.body": "request.body"},
merge=True,
)
after = await api.get_draft_workspace(
workspace_id="report",
include_draft=True,
)
assert after == before
```
Add a second rejection test with a path binding before a literal binding,
proving the compatibility serializer cannot move that literal to its normal
literal-prefix position. Keep the existing simple merge test as the positive
representable case.
Add a stale-revision test where the draft contains fan-out but the request uses
an old revision. Assert a conflict payload, not the lossless-merge `ValueError`.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run the focused tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "step_input_map_merge" -q
```
Expected: the fan-out and interleaving tests fail because the merge succeeds or
rewrites the list; the stale-revision test fails if preflight runs first.
- [ ] **Step 3: Add the revision preflight and exact round-trip guard**
In `WorkflowDraftApi`, add:
```python
def _workspace_if_revision_matches(
self,
*,
workspace_id: str,
revision: int,
) -> WorkflowDraftWorkspace | dict[str, Any]:
"""Load one workspace or return its canonical revision-conflict payload."""
```
Use the same summary/diagnostic shape already produced by
`WorkflowDraftAuthoringApi._workspace_if_revision_matches`. Refactor that
authoring helper to delegate to `self.drafts._workspace_if_revision_matches`
instead of maintaining two conflict implementations.
Add a module helper:
```python
def _require_lossless_step_input_map_round_trip(
payload: object,
*,
step_id: str,
) -> tuple[dict[str, str], dict[str, Any]]:
"""Return compatibility maps only when they reproduce the binding list."""
input_map, input_values = _input_maps_from_payload(payload)
rebuilt = _draft_input_bindings_payload(input_map, input_values)
if rebuilt != payload:
raise ValueError(
f"step {step_id!r} inputs cannot be safely merged through a "
"compatibility map; replace the complete canonical binding list instead"
)
return input_map, input_values
```
Update `set_step_input_map` so `merge=True`:
1. calls `_workspace_if_revision_matches`;
2. immediately returns a conflict payload when stale;
3. reads the selected step from that workspace;
4. calls the round-trip guard;
5. overlays the requested map;
6. delegates the final mutation to `patch_draft_workspace`.
Do not run the guard for replacement mode (`merge=False`).
- [ ] **Step 4: Run focused tests and verify GREEN**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "step_input_map_merge or step_map_helpers_merge" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
- [ ] **Step 5: Commit Task 1**
```bash
git add src/wf_api/drafts.py src/wf_api/draft_authoring.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py
git commit -m "fix: reject lossy step input map merges"
```
### Task 2: Guard Step Output And Workflow Output Merges
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_api/drafts.py`
- Test: `tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py`
**Interfaces:**
- Produces: `_require_lossless_step_output_map_round_trip(payload, *, step_id)`
- Preserves: `WorkflowDraftApi.set_step_output_map`
- Preserves: `WorkflowDraftApi.set_workflow_output_map`
- [ ] **Step 1: Write failing step-output fan-out tests**
Create a draft whose step output contains:
```python
[
{"source": "report.title", "target": "state.report.title"},
{"source": "report.title", "target": "state.audit.title"},
]
```
Call:
```python
await api.set_step_output_map(
workspace_id="report",
revision=2,
step_id="report",
output_map={"rendered": "state.rendered"},
merge=True,
)
```
with an unrelated new mapping.
Assert `ValueError` contains `complete canonical binding list`, then assert the
full workspace and revision remain unchanged.
Add a stale-revision variant and retain the existing unique-source merge test as
the positive case.
- [ ] **Step 2: Write failing workflow-output ambiguity tests**
Create workflow output bindings:
```python
[
{"path": "state.title", "target": "report.title"},
{"path": "state.title", "target": "audit.title"},
{"value": "markdown", "target": "format"},
]
```
Add two tests:
1. merging `{"state.title": "renamed"}` rejects and does not mutate;
2. merging `{"state.other": "other"}` succeeds while preserving both
`state.title` bindings, the literal, and their order.
- [ ] **Step 3: Run focused tests and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "step_output_map_merge or workflow_output_map_merge" -q
```
Expected: fan-out step output is collapsed and the ambiguous workflow-output
source updates multiple bindings.
- [ ] **Step 4: Implement minimal guards**
Add:
```python
def _require_lossless_step_output_map_round_trip(
payload: object,
*,
step_id: str,
) -> dict[str, str]:
"""Return a compatibility map only when it reproduces the output list."""
output_map = _output_map_from_payload(payload)
rebuilt = _draft_output_bindings_payload(output_map)
if rebuilt != payload:
raise ValueError(
f"step {step_id!r} outputs cannot be safely merged through a "
"compatibility map; replace the complete canonical binding list instead"
)
return output_map
```
Apply the same revision-first ordering used by Task 1.
For workflow outputs, count existing path bindings only for keys in the
requested `output_map`. Before constructing the merged list, reject a source
whose count is greater than one:
```python
ambiguous = next(
(
source
for source in output_map
if sum(
1
for binding in output_payload
if isinstance(binding, dict) and binding.get("path") == source
)
> 1
),
None,
)
if ambiguous is not None:
raise ValueError(
f"workflow output source {ambiguous!r} has multiple bindings and "
"cannot be updated through a compatibility map; replace the complete "
"canonical binding list instead"
)
```
Leave unrequested duplicate sources and literal records untouched.
- [ ] **Step 5: Run focused and API regression tests**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py -k "map_helpers or set_step_input_map or set_step_output_map or set_workflow_output_map" -q
```
Expected: all selected tests pass.
- [ ] **Step 6: Commit Task 2**
```bash
git add src/wf_api/drafts.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py
git commit -m "fix: reject ambiguous output map merges"
```
### Task 3: Align CLI Guidance, Issues, And Verification
**Files:**
- Modify: `src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py`
- Modify: `tests/wf_cli/test_app.py`
- Modify: `ISSUES.md`
**Interfaces:**
- Consumes: compatibility merge errors from Tasks 1-2
- Produces: CLI help that describes rejection rather than acceptable loss
- [ ] **Step 1: Write the failing CLI help assertion**
Update `test_wf_draft_map_help_explains_replace_merge_and_validate` to require:
```python
assert "rejects existing bindings that cannot round-trip safely" in input_help
assert "replace the complete canonical binding list" in output_help
assert "ambiguous fan-out sources" in workflow_output_help
```
Remove assertions that describe compatibility merge as merely
`potentially lossy`.
- [ ] **Step 2: Run the CLI help test and verify RED**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_cli/test_app.py::test_wf_draft_map_help_explains_replace_merge_and_validate -q
```
Expected: FAIL because current help still says `potentially lossy`.
- [ ] **Step 3: Update command help and issue state**
Revise the `set-input`, `set-output`, and `set-workflow-output` docstrings and
`--merge` help text. State that merge:
- is compatibility-only;
- preserves simple map-shaped bindings;
- rejects canonical lists it cannot reproduce;
- requires canonical replacement for fan-out or ambiguous records.
Mark the `ISSUES.md` compatibility step map item complete and summarize the
guarded behavior without claiming the map representation gained fan-out.
- [ ] **Step 4: Run focused verification**
Run:
```bash
uv run pytest tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py tests/wf_cli/test_remote_target.py -q
uv run ruff check src/wf_api/drafts.py src/wf_api/draft_authoring.py src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py tests/wf_api/test_drafts_service.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py
uv run basedpyright --level error src/wf_api src/wf_cli
git diff --check
```
Expected: tests pass, Ruff reports no issues, basedpyright reports zero errors,
and `git diff --check` emits no errors.
- [ ] **Step 5: Commit Task 3**
```bash
git add src/wf_cli/commands/drafts.py tests/wf_cli/test_app.py ISSUES.md
git commit -m "docs: explain safe compatibility merges"
```
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ without changing:
- path/literal interleaving.
This rejects source fan-out, duplicate literal targets, and any ordering that
the map serializer would rearrange. A simple list with unique path sources and
an exactly reproducible literal suffix remains mergeable.
the map serializer would rearrange. A simple list with an exactly reproducible
literal prefix followed by unique path sources remains mergeable.
### Step Outputs