Files
lda-wf/docs/runbooks/presentation-followup-visual-review.md
T

3.8 KiB

Presentation Follow-Up Visual Review

Review date: 2026-07-13

This record closes the visual/story follow-up pass described by presentation follow-up visual/story pass. It records what was checked, what is now presentable, and what remains a factual or product follow-up rather than silently treating it as solved.

Verification

  • Presentation route contract: 7 changed routes assert one exact heading, one primary visual region, and no outer document scroll.
  • Focused evaluation, conclusion, and opening tests: 16 passed.
  • Workflow graph tests: 34 passed.
  • Full web gate: console 754 passed; RPC 52 passed and 6 skipped; server 46 passed.
  • Full web typecheck and build passed; the build retains the known Vite chunk size warning.
  • Rehearsal capture: 42 routes at both 1280x720 and 1024x768 (84 PNGs).
  • Typecheck: pnpm --dir web typecheck passed.
  • Browser smoke: checked at 1280x720 and 1024x768 for the workflow graph, evaluation findings, conclusion, and Scene 1 opening.
  • Workflow graph: React Flow initializes with a measured fitView; all ten nodes and both outcome branches remain inside the graph frame at both target viewports.

Fixed Visuals

Area Result
Scene 1 opening Product goal, implementation boundary, and planner/tool-surface/runner decomposition are distinct. The opening caption remains editorial and borderless; its row sizes to content instead of clipping the lower padding.
Scene 5 to 7 story Lifecycle vocabulary now leads into authoring and repair rather than presenting authoring as an isolated diagnostic screen.
Scenes 7 and 9 Authoring and prepared-lifecycle evidence use a dominant artifact with secondary assistant/support surfaces.
Scene 9 graph The graph is horizontal, factual, selectable, draggable/zoomable, and fit to the initialized React Flow viewport. Outcome shapes and edge labels remain visible.
Scene 12 findings Six findings use a readable 3x2 layout with icons, campaign size, outcome counts, and the bounded-evidence statement visible together.
Scene 13 conclusion The typed substrate and closing boundary are dominant; non-claims and future-work layers recede without being removed from their own beats.

Remaining Findings

FACTUAL

  • Scene 10 input remains a prepared-run manifest, not a factual file browser distinguishing declared, selected, read, and produced files. This remains a separate roadmap item.
  • The prepared revision-request replay uses run_recorded_lda_report_revision, while the submitted replay uses run_recorded_lda_report. Do not describe the revision recording as the same persisted run until a same-run recording is available.

PRODUCT

  • Live Scene 9-11 execution is health-checked and connectable, but still needs a complete rehearsed start -> interrupt -> resume -> output -> trace path on the running workflow server.
  • The presentation chat remains a scripted/replay product surface. A live LLM driver and streaming agent conversation are future work.

BLOCKED / DEFERRED

  • A full manual inspection of every screenshot generated by the 42-route, two-viewport rehearsal script remains a rehearsal activity, not a claim that every beat has been visually hand-approved.
  • The final defense story-flow review and presenter companion assets remain separate from this visual pass.

Rehearsal Commands

pnpm --dir web test -- --run
pnpm --dir web typecheck
pnpm --dir web build
./scripts/presentation-rehearsal.ps1

Use defense-presentation.md for live/replay fallbacks and presentation-rehearsal-matrix.md for the route-by-route speaking line and evidence pointer.